Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default

I have heard good... Read More

Posted: Review #721

As a PI, she is an excellent mentor who genuinely sees her students as whole people, not just researchers. She is deeply invested in making sure they leave her lab as capable scientists. She holds herself and her students to a high standard, both in the quality of their research and in their commitment to scientific integrity. She is very... Read More

Posted: Review #723

江苏省原子医学研究所与大学联合培养,挂名,去夫妻档课题组做实验... Read More

Posted: Review #716

Bad mentor. Raises his voice at his students when they make mistakes. He doesn't have a good reputation among... Read More

Posted: Review #720

## 导师的指导风格 给大方向,让学生自由发挥。平时不找学生,在遇到困难的时候给帮助。 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #729

江苏省原子医学研究所研究员,与多所大学合作联合培养,夫妻档,请查看公开信息... Read More

Posted: Review #711

根据某学生论坛,该老师博士生要不延毕,要不八年博士,慎选! ![111](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OYBDOOO/oss/master/uPic/ekQvRS.png) -----... Read More

Posted: Review #714

## Advisor Style & Mentorship 1. You would typically meet with the PI at least once a week, and sometimes more or less frequently depending on his preferences. 2. He is generally very accessible. 3. At times this can feel overly hands-on or intrusive, which may contribute to a less motivating work environment. ## Expectations for PhD Students 1.... Read More

Posted: Review #727

江苏省原子医学研究所研究员,与多所大学合作联合培养,夫妻档,请查看公开信息... Read More

Posted: Review #709

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The advising style was often difficult to work with. Communication could be harsh and, at times, felt disrespectful. Feedback was not always delivered constructively, and even minor mistakes (such as small typos) could trigger disproportionately strong reactions. This made it challenging to maintain a productive and... Read More

Posted: Review #728