Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
校外联培 夫妻搭档 一一作一通讯 抢一作 压数据 无指导但人格羞辱 严格打卡 不可实习，最好不好有考公等等念头会被穿小鞋... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Hands on and nice advisor. The only problem is how much he delays the publication of the papers and is not honest with the deadlines. ## Lab Culture Everyone is nice and help each other, good lab... Read More
# PI Review ***The PI's advertised expertise and his actual capability are totally different things, and you only discover the gap after you're invested in the program. Before joining, watch one of his recorded presentations on his website — especially the Q&A portion. The pattern you'll see in how he handles technical questions is what your... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More
Extremely bad. This person has no decency or morals at all. He hates junior scientists and doesn't allow junior scientists to have a different opinion from his. If you dare to have a different opinion or point out his mistake and show proofs, he loses his temper immediately and starts to use many derogatory words on you, and if you're an... Read More
He seems kind from outside and a good collaborator but be very **careful**, he has shown violence against students, including throwing things to them, yelling,... Read More
Would I recommend this PI? Absolutely not. I feel sorry for all the people that ever worked with him. He mistakes his personal preferences for academic standards, dismisses evidence he dislikes, and uses his position to psychologically control students. Do not join this group. No paper is worth... Read More
He's mean, rude, racist, and misogynistic. He never takes students or postdocs seriously, especially the international ones and the female ones. He's ill-tempered and very narrow-minded. He doesn't listen to students' or postdocs' opinions. His English is not very good, and he once even tried to correct a native English speaker's English - it... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Abusive, passive-aggressive, absent mentor. Not open to new methods even if cheap to apply. Highly incompetent ## Expectations for PhD Students Usually takes 4-6 years to graduate, requires 2 publications, so average requirements. Overall respect of work-life balance in appearance ## Funding & Support Stipend is... Read More
Very rude and... Read More