Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
## 导师的指导风格... Read More
## 对博士生的要求 很高，需要有高的标准 ## 经费和支持 经费雄厚，远超同期的PI ## 科研 这个组在某乎上有负面评价，但自从他拿到菲涅尔奖之后就少了很多，同时通过google可以看到该组今年的情况，光学类排名前四名中除了第一名的综述期刊(Light, elight, nature photonics)都有了，也看到有nature communications，以及PRL，这对于一个建立三年左右的组来说已经非常不错。建议多从google上看成果，角度更客观。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
信口开河，水平不行，来了一定会后悔。... Read More
Back when I used to be in this lab, not a day went by where I didn’t want to kill myself. She is manipulative and emotionally abusive. On top of that she’s a sociopathic liar and will say anything to get what she wants. Don’t believe anything that comes out of her mouth … Her being nice in the beginning is all an act. Last I heard she’s still... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Her advisor style is based heavily on micromanaging and keeping people in the lab on their toes by being unpredictable. As an example: You have a meeting with her, plan an experiment step by step. You do everything as she says. Next lab meeting, she will end up saying she never told you to do that, and everything you... Read More
### 导师的指导风格非常到位 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持比较充足 ## 科研能力强 ##... Read More
Very negative experience regarding the course and handling of intellectual property. Students should be extremely cautious about protecting their original work. Avoid at any... Read More
****## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Based on my experience, supervision was largely hands-off, with no guidance. Research topics were vague, and trainees were often expected to design and work independently with no scientific input. Interactions tended to focus on publishing rather than mentorship or intellectual development. Career guidance and... Read More
权力的囚徒。别靠近，会变得不幸。... Read More