Latest Reviews

## 对博士生的要求 很高，需要有高的标准 ## 经费和支持 经费雄厚，远超同期的PI ## 科研 这个组在某乎上有负面评价，但自从他拿到菲涅尔奖之后就少了很多，同时通过google可以看到该组今年的情况，光学类排名前四名中除了第一名的综述期刊(Light, elight, nature photonics)都有了，也看到有nature communications，以及PRL，这对于一个建立三年左右的组来说已经非常不错。建议多从google上看成果，角度更客观。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

权力的囚徒。别靠近，会变得不幸。... Read More

## 导师的指导风格... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

信口开河，水平不行，来了一定会后悔。... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 与同事关系堪忧，已知其师门关系也差。为学生提供较次要的指导意见（如格式毛病、参考文献“权威性”不足等等）。热衷堆叠古籍引文，遮掩观点浅薄与逻辑混乱的地方，也要求学生帮忙搜集尽可能多的文献。 ## 对博士生的要求 会与博士生合作。但通过签约扣留博士生（以及硕士生）的硕士论文，利用保密期的时间差（甚至永久保密），加工学位论文后占为己有，屡试不爽。或利用发刊毕业要求，占据第一作者或独作坑位。不能完全否定本人的原创性，但论文产出多来自学生是板上钉钉的事实。要追认劳动贡献存在灰色地带。 ## 经费和支持 手上有国家级社科项目，借学生劳务费的幌子套取报销经费，利用微信中转，中饱私囊。... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The supervisory style was hostile, unpredictable, and frequently inappropriate. He routinely used condescending language toward students, including statements such as telling me to “grow up” during an email exchange where I politely disagreed with him about the papers I should cite. His feedback to other students... Read More

保研人注意，这个老师言而无信，给你预留保研名额的承诺不要当真。我和另一位同学在7月份就和他联系好了，前后面试了课题组的两个老师，几天后承诺预留名额，只需参加复试即可。后面和他反复确认，他说复试不会刷人，是等额面试（后面才知道他跟6个人都这么说，实际上只有4个名额）。结果就是面试之后说我复试没通过，当时已经是9月13号了，我没有联系其他学校，好在后来填了很多学校，也收到了offer，不然真给他害惨了。一个毫无信用可言的老师... Read More