Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More
****## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More
权力的囚徒。别靠近，会变得不幸。... Read More
Back when I used to be in this lab, not a day went by where I didn’t want to kill myself. She is manipulative and emotionally abusive. On top of that she’s a sociopathic liar and will say anything to get what she wants. Don’t believe anything that comes out of her mouth … Her being nice in the beginning is all an act. Last I heard she’s still... Read More
She enjoys belittling students. She denies their contributions. She also loves arguing with students about things unrelated to academics. She's not as kind to students as she claims. She believes students should frequently stay up late. Working with her is incredibly... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 擅长指导如何用茶杯砸副校长的头，把亲姐按在办公室门口揍，上门找自己的恩人要钱，酗酒，掼蛋，刷微信小视频。 ## 对博士生的要求 要求博士生用他满意的美术风格画图，改几个版本出来给他选。 要求博士生多做工作多写文章但不要让他改文章和投稿。 ## 经费和支持 法律允许的最小值。 ## 科研 没有一篇一作论文但评上中科大副教授兼博士生导师的高水平人才。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
He is super push. Do not consider him if you want to live... Read More
Very negative experience regarding the course and handling of intellectual property. Students should be extremely cautious about protecting their original work. Avoid at any... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Based on my experience, supervision was largely hands-off, with no guidance. Research topics were vague, and trainees were often expected to design and work independently with no scientific input. Interactions tended to focus on publishing rather than mentorship or intellectual development. Career guidance and... Read More