Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default

He is very rude and condescending and makes you feel terrible and like you don't belong after every meeting. Unfortunately I love the research and I'm stuck with... Read More

Posted: Review #704

## 导师的指导风格 Trevor had been most certainly helpful with my Thesis, for the general directions and ideas he gave. He also permits a high degree of freedom, as if your idea had been good, he would encourage you doing it. He had been swift in replying emails and proactive in arranging lab meeting or personal meeting. It had been a great pleassure... Read More

Posted: Review #703

She enjoys belittling students. She denies their contributions. She also loves arguing with students about things unrelated to academics. She's not as kind to students as she claims. She believes students should frequently stay up late. Working with her is incredibly... Read More

Posted: Review #699

Excellent vibe in the group! Kristin possesses the charisma and supports each group member in advancing the boundaries of scientific knowledge. Do not hesitate to join the group if the opportunity... Read More

Posted: Review #705

## Advisor Style & Mentorship He is overly critical and can hardly tolerate any mistakes. Even a small typo will turn him into an angry barking man. He frequently makes false promises and breaks his commitments. ## Expectations for PhD Students He hoped the students would solve everything themselves, and he wouldn't need to do anything. ## Funding... Read More

Posted: Review #706

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Her advisor style is based heavily on micromanaging and keeping people in the lab on their toes by being unpredictable. As an example: You have a meeting with her, plan an experiment step by step. You do everything as she says. Next lab meeting, she will end up saying she never told you to do that, and everything you... Read More

Posted: Review #689

## 导师的指导风格 很少指导,基本把学生交给化学系董安钢带,自己在外开公司,基本财富自由了,一般不管学生,找他基本相当于挂名。董安钢的话还是可以的,和聂志鸿比较接近,组会上指导相对细致,组内还有小老板李同涛,也是比较好接触的 ## 对博士生的要求 不高,文章达到系里要求就不为难,文章和盲审过了就让走 ## 经费和支持 还不错,基本不缺,补贴每月1500元,好像是按组会次数发,正常每人两周讲一次组会 ## 科研 还不错吧,董安钢做的东西和高分子关系不大,主要是自组装一类的,做一些结构,再去找应用方向,一般是催化和电池,可以发一些不错的文章,发不了高分文章也不强求。没什么实际用处,毕业一般得转行,去半导体、新能源、车企、华为、考公之类的去向比较多 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #702

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

Posted: Review #690

权力的囚徒。别靠近,会变得不幸。... Read More

Posted: Review #684

He is super push. Do not consider him if you want to live... Read More

Posted: Review #700