Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default

## 导师的指导风格 擅长指导如何用茶杯砸副校长的头,把亲姐按在办公室门口揍,上门找自己的恩人要钱,酗酒,掼蛋,刷微信小视频。 ## 对博士生的要求 要求博士生用他满意的美术风格画图,改几个版本出来给他选。 要求博士生多做工作多写文章但不要让他改文章和投稿。 ## 经费和支持 法律允许的最小值。 ## 科研 没有一篇一作论文但评上中科大副教授兼博士生导师的高水平人才。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #678

## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #668

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Dr. Kelson's Advisor Style is a Communicator. In order to do well as his Graduate Student in his research lab, ALWAYS communicate with him. Best methods of communication is DIRECTLY in person with him at his office. Second best mode of communication is calling & texting him through his phone number of which he will... Read More

Posted: Review #669

Very negative experience regarding the course and handling of intellectual property. Students should be extremely cautious about protecting their original work. Avoid at any... Read More

Posted: Review #679

## 对博士生的要求 很高,需要有高的标准 ## 经费和支持 经费雄厚,远超同期的PI ## 科研 这个组在某乎上有负面评价,但自从他拿到菲涅尔奖之后就少了很多,同时通过google可以看到该组今年的情况,光学类排名前四名中除了第一名的综述期刊(Light, elight, nature photonics)都有了,也看到有nature communications,以及PRL,这对于一个建立三年左右的组来说已经非常不错。建议多从google上看成果,角度更客观。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #673

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The supervisory style was hostile, unpredictable, and frequently inappropriate. He routinely used condescending language toward students, including statements such as telling me to “grow up” during an email exchange where I politely disagreed with him about the papers I should cite. His feedback to other students... Read More

Posted: Review #683

## Advisor Style & Mentorship ## Expectations for PhD Students ## Funding & Support ## Research ## Lab Culture 总的来说,要他指导任何东西就算了。 上课纯ppt。划重点则是把全文都画上。张口闭口就是他在 1980 年的什么经历,质量可见一斑。 至于科研,非常神奇的一个人。任何东西他都会指导,但其实他也只是在build 自己的 resume罢了。基本没有任何帮助。 甚至有过盗发学生文章,侵占科研经费的情况。文章被盗发的学生向学校ac部门举报,而学校的ac部门自然是玩消失啦~... Read More

Posted: Review #663

保研人注意,这个老师言而无信,给你预留保研名额的承诺不要当真。我和另一位同学在7月份就和他联系好了,前后面试了课题组的两个老师,几天后承诺预留名额,只需参加复试即可。后面和他反复确认,他说复试不会刷人,是等额面试(后面才知道他跟6个人都这么说,实际上只有4个名额)。结果就是面试之后说我复试没通过,当时已经是9月13号了,我没有联系其他学校,好在后来填了很多学校,也收到了offer,不然真给他害惨了。一个毫无信用可言的老师... Read More

Posted: Review #674

Hi is really supportive and approachable, set clear expectations, and give you room to grow. The lab culture is genuinely fun and collaborative, and if you ever need help, they’re always there to guide you. It’s a great environment to learn and do research. I did see another comment that was more negative, so I think it might be a good idea to set... Read More

Posted: Review #667

信口开河,水平不行,来了一定会后悔。... Read More

Posted: Review #685