Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
# PI Review ***The PI's advertised expertise and his actual capability are totally different things, and you only discover the gap after you're invested in the program. Before joining, watch one of his recorded presentations on his website — especially the Q&A portion. The pattern you'll see in how he handles technical questions is what your... Read More
Very rude and... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 8分 ## 对博士生的要求 8分 ## 经费和支持 8分 ## 科研 9分 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
Extremely bad. This person has no decency or morals at all. He hates junior scientists and doesn't allow junior scientists to have a different opinion from his. If you dare to have a different opinion or point out his mistake and show proofs, he loses his temper immediately and starts to use many derogatory words on you, and if you're an... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Hands on and nice advisor. The only problem is how much he delays the publication of the papers and is not honest with the deadlines. ## Lab Culture Everyone is nice and help each other, good lab... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Difficult to work with and publish papers. ## Funding & Support Relies mostly in TAs, pays just 11 of 12 month per year. ## Lab Culture Not professional. Very nice if you do what the professor wants if not prepare for being... Read More
Would I recommend this PI? Absolutely not. I feel sorry for all the people that ever worked with him. He mistakes his personal preferences for academic standards, dismisses evidence he dislikes, and uses his position to psychologically control students. Do not join this group. No paper is worth... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship: toxic ## Expectations for PhD Students: rude to students ## Funding & Support: lost funding ## Research: thinks obesity is healthy ## Lab Culture:... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship If you are a man, would be ok, if you are a woman expect to probably be treated unfairly (that is what I have seen but I have heard from women collegues that he has been investigated for more regarding his behaviour with women). ## Expectations for PhD Students He supports his students publish several papers (which is... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Abusive, passive-aggressive, absent mentor. Not open to new methods even if cheap to apply. Highly incompetent ## Expectations for PhD Students Usually takes 4-6 years to graduate, requires 2 publications, so average requirements. Overall respect of work-life balance in appearance ## Funding & Support Stipend is... Read More