Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default

## Advisor Style & Mentorship: toxic ## Expectations for PhD Students: rude to students ## Funding & Support: lost funding ## Research: thinks obesity is healthy ## Lab Culture:... Read More

Posted: Review #741

## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More

Posted: Review #734

Extremely bad. This person has no decency or morals at all. He hates junior scientists and doesn't allow junior scientists to have a different opinion from his. If you dare to have a different opinion or point out his mistake and show proofs, he loses his temper immediately and starts to use many derogatory words on you, and if you're an... Read More

Posted: Review #753

Very rude and... Read More

Posted: Review #750

## 导师的指导风格 8分 ## 对博士生的要求 8分 ## 经费和支持 8分 ## 科研 9分 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #739

## 导师的指导风格 PUA 瞎指导 ## 经费和支持 0 ## 科研... Read More

Posted: Review #747

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Difficult to work with and publish papers. ## Funding & Support Relies mostly in TAs, pays just 11 of 12 month per year. ## Lab Culture Not professional. Very nice if you do what the professor wants if not prepare for being... Read More

Posted: Review #754

## 导师的指导风格 感觉是那种愿意了解学生的老师,平时不管是科研上的事,还是生活里的问题,都挺关心的,比较尊重学生、也愿意站在学生角度考虑问题的那种导师。至少能保证每周的组会,如果有需求的话也可以约一对一的讨论,感觉对讨论挺鼓励的。没怎么发过邮件,回消息啥的倒是挺快的。 ## 对博士生的要求 整体来说要求是比较合理的。不是放养,但也绝对不是压榨型。导师对科研质量肯定是有追求的,能看出来是真的想把学生培养出来,而不是单纯把学生当劳动力用。我觉得人品好的导师怎么样都不会很很差。现在看来很尊重学生自己的想法,想工作的也放实习,要求和大实验室一致。组里的项目都是那种发论文的,没有需要横向干活的那种。毕业要求、年限啥的和大实验室都是一样的,传统了没啥好说的。 ## 经费和支持... Read More

Posted: Review #737

## 导师的指导风格 放养。要求995,硕士500博士1500月薪。学术水平很差。课题组没有实验条件,只有仿真服务器,无法实操。 ## 对博士生的要求 对博士生只管做的项目,对课题毫无帮助,且常常误导方向。已经耽误第一届博士2年 ## 经费和支持 课题组经费很少,课题一旦有成果马上让去干私活。保毕业后只给三四作。基本不会教学生如何做科研。 ## 科研 科研水平很差,且只管自己。干活都是免费干,帮外头人干活给外面人发3000但自己发400. 课题组就业去向也都很差。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #735

## Advisor Style & Mentorship If you are a man, would be ok, if you are a woman expect to probably be treated unfairly. ## Expectations for PhD Students He supports his students publish several papers (which is good). ## Funding & Support Relies in TAs mostly ## Lab Culture Huge group, lots of students. He is the typical professor that will bully... Read More

Posted: Review #755