Latest Reviews

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship He is overly critical and can hardly tolerate any mistakes. Even a small typo will turn him into an angry barking man. He frequently makes false promises and breaks his commitments. ## Expectations for PhD Students He hoped the students would solve everything themselves, and he wouldn't need to do anything. ## Funding... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

## 导师的指导风格... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

She enjoys belittling students. She denies their contributions. She also loves arguing with students about things unrelated to academics. She's not as kind to students as she claims. She believes students should frequently stay up late. Working with her is incredibly... Read More

信口开河，水平不行，来了一定会后悔。... Read More

He is very rude and condescending and makes you feel terrible and like you don't belong after every meeting. Unfortunately I love the research and I'm stuck with... Read More