Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default

Back when I used to be in this lab, not a day went by where I didn’t want to kill myself. She is manipulative and emotionally abusive. On top of that she’s a sociopathic liar and will say anything to get what she wants. Don’t believe anything that comes out of her mouth … Her being nice in the beginning is all an act. Last I heard she’s still... Read More

Posted: Review #681

She enjoys belittling students. She denies their contributions. She also loves arguing with students about things unrelated to academics. She's not as kind to students as she claims. She believes students should frequently stay up late. Working with her is incredibly... Read More

Posted: Review #699

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

Posted: Review #688

He is super push. Do not consider him if you want to live... Read More

Posted: Review #700

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

Posted: Review #687

## 导师的指导风格 很少指导,基本把学生交给化学系董安钢带,自己在外开公司,基本财富自由了,一般不管学生,找他基本相当于挂名。董安钢的话还是可以的,和聂志鸿比较接近,组会上指导相对细致,组内还有小老板李同涛,也是比较好接触的 ## 对博士生的要求 不高,文章达到系里要求就不为难,文章和盲审过了就让走 ## 经费和支持 还不错,基本不缺,补贴每月1500元,好像是按组会次数发,正常每人两周讲一次组会 ## 科研 还不错吧,董安钢做的东西和高分子关系不大,主要是自组装一类的,做一些结构,再去找应用方向,一般是催化和电池,可以发一些不错的文章,发不了高分文章也不强求。没什么实际用处,毕业一般得转行,去半导体、新能源、车企、华为、考公之类的去向比较多 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #702

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Based on my experience, supervision was largely hands-off, with no guidance. Research topics were vague, and trainees were often expected to design and work independently with no scientific input. Interactions tended to focus on publishing rather than mentorship or intellectual development. Career guidance and... Read More

Posted: Review #692

## 导师的指导风格 呵 ## 对博士生的要求 呵 ## 经费和支持 呵 ## 科研 呵 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #698

He is very rude and condescending and makes you feel terrible and like you don't belong after every meeting. Unfortunately I love the research and I'm stuck with... Read More

Posted: Review #704

## 导师的指导风格... Read More

Posted: Review #691