Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default

## 导师的指导风格 很少指导,基本把学生交给化学系董安钢带,自己在外开公司,基本财富自由了,一般不管学生,找他基本相当于挂名。董安钢的话还是可以的,和聂志鸿比较接近,组会上指导相对细致,组内还有小老板李同涛,也是比较好接触的 ## 对博士生的要求 不高,文章达到系里要求就不为难,文章和盲审过了就让走 ## 经费和支持 还不错,基本不缺,补贴每月1500元,好像是按组会次数发,正常每人两周讲一次组会 ## 科研 还不错吧,董安钢做的东西和高分子关系不大,主要是自组装一类的,做一些结构,再去找应用方向,一般是催化和电池,可以发一些不错的文章,发不了高分文章也不强求。没什么实际用处,毕业一般得转行,去半导体、新能源、车企、华为、考公之类的去向比较多 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #702

信口开河,水平不行,来了一定会后悔。... Read More

Posted: Review #685

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

Posted: Review #690

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Her advisor style is based heavily on micromanaging and keeping people in the lab on their toes by being unpredictable. As an example: You have a meeting with her, plan an experiment step by step. You do everything as she says. Next lab meeting, she will end up saying she never told you to do that, and everything you... Read More

Posted: Review #689

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

Posted: Review #687

## 导师的指导风格 Trevor had been most certainly helpful with my Thesis, for the general directions and ideas he gave. He also permits a high degree of freedom, as if your idea had been good, he would encourage you doing it. He had been swift in replying emails and proactive in arranging lab meeting or personal meeting. It had been a great pleassure... Read More

Posted: Review #703

She enjoys belittling students. She denies their contributions. She also loves arguing with students about things unrelated to academics. She's not as kind to students as she claims. She believes students should frequently stay up late. Working with her is incredibly... Read More

Posted: Review #699

## 导师的指导风格 与同事关系堪忧,已知其师门关系也差。为学生提供较次要的指导意见(如格式毛病、参考文献“权威性”不足等等)。热衷堆叠古籍引文,遮掩观点浅薄与逻辑混乱的地方,也要求学生帮忙搜集尽可能多的文献。 ## 对博士生的要求 会与博士生合作。但通过签约扣留博士生(以及硕士生)的硕士论文,利用保密期的时间差(甚至永久保密),加工学位论文后占为己有,屡试不爽。或利用发刊毕业要求,占据第一作者或独作坑位。不能完全否定本人的原创性,但论文产出多来自学生是板上钉钉的事实。要追认劳动贡献存在灰色地带。 ## 经费和支持 手上有国家级社科项目,借学生劳务费的幌子套取报销经费,利用微信中转,中饱私囊。... Read More

Posted: Review #680

Back when I used to be in this lab, not a day went by where I didn’t want to kill myself. She is manipulative and emotionally abusive. On top of that she’s a sociopathic liar and will say anything to get what she wants. Don’t believe anything that comes out of her mouth … Her being nice in the beginning is all an act. Last I heard she’s still... Read More

Posted: Review #681

## 导师的指导风格 擅长指导如何用茶杯砸副校长的头,把亲姐按在办公室门口揍,上门找自己的恩人要钱,酗酒,掼蛋,刷微信小视频。 ## 对博士生的要求 要求博士生用他满意的美术风格画图,改几个版本出来给他选。 要求博士生多做工作多写文章但不要让他改文章和投稿。 ## 经费和支持 法律允许的最小值。 ## 科研 没有一篇一作论文但评上中科大副教授兼博士生导师的高水平人才。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #678