Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default

## 导师的指导风格... Read More

Posted: Review #691

He is super push. Do not consider him if you want to live... Read More

Posted: Review #700

Excellent vibe in the group! Kristin possesses the charisma and supports each group member in advancing the boundaries of scientific knowledge. Do not hesitate to join the group if the opportunity... Read More

Posted: Review #705

## 导师的指导风格 呵 ## 对博士生的要求 呵 ## 经费和支持 呵 ## 科研 呵 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #698

She enjoys belittling students. She denies their contributions. She also loves arguing with students about things unrelated to academics. She's not as kind to students as she claims. She believes students should frequently stay up late. Working with her is incredibly... Read More

Posted: Review #699

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

Posted: Review #690

## 导师的指导风格 很少指导,基本把学生交给化学系董安钢带,自己在外开公司,基本财富自由了,一般不管学生,找他基本相当于挂名。董安钢的话还是可以的,和聂志鸿比较接近,组会上指导相对细致,组内还有小老板李同涛,也是比较好接触的 ## 对博士生的要求 不高,文章达到系里要求就不为难,文章和盲审过了就让走 ## 经费和支持 还不错,基本不缺,补贴每月1500元,好像是按组会次数发,正常每人两周讲一次组会 ## 科研 还不错吧,董安钢做的东西和高分子关系不大,主要是自组装一类的,做一些结构,再去找应用方向,一般是催化和电池,可以发一些不错的文章,发不了高分文章也不强求。没什么实际用处,毕业一般得转行,去半导体、新能源、车企、华为、考公之类的去向比较多 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

Posted: Review #702

## 导师的指导风格 与同事关系堪忧,已知其师门关系也差。为学生提供较次要的指导意见(如格式毛病、参考文献“权威性”不足等等)。热衷堆叠古籍引文,遮掩观点浅薄与逻辑混乱的地方,也要求学生帮忙搜集尽可能多的文献。 ## 对博士生的要求 会与博士生合作。但通过签约扣留博士生(以及硕士生)的硕士论文,利用保密期的时间差(甚至永久保密),加工学位论文后占为己有,屡试不爽。或利用发刊毕业要求,占据第一作者或独作坑位。不能完全否定本人的原创性,但论文产出多来自学生是板上钉钉的事实。要追认劳动贡献存在灰色地带。 ## 经费和支持 手上有国家级社科项目,借学生劳务费的幌子套取报销经费,利用微信中转,中饱私囊。... Read More

Posted: Review #680

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

Posted: Review #688

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The supervisory style was hostile, unpredictable, and frequently inappropriate. He routinely used condescending language toward students, including statements such as telling me to “grow up” during an email exchange where I politely disagreed with him about the papers I should cite. His feedback to other students... Read More

Posted: Review #683