Latest Reviews

夫妻档，一人一作一人通讯，抢一作，压数据，拖文章，拖久了等学生走了署名就可以自说自话任意安排啦。嫡子拿来做传统方向，外姓拿来试错，试个×年，然后好像真的行不通呢。... Read More

根据中科大“评课社区”评价。内容过于炸裂，各位请自行点开链接！ https://icourse.club/course/20695/#review-88251... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 这个导师是性格非常具有侵略性的（aggressive）。对于哲学博士（PhD）学生，他提供的是绝对零度的指导！以及极度低下的人品 & unpolite to everybody. ## 对博士生的要求 在“毕业已经是一件极端困难的事”这样的背景下，他的期望依然像天空一样高。因此，成功毕业在这里变成了一个更不可能的任务。 ## 经费和支持 关于资金（funding），我缺乏相关的知识。在事实上，这里存在着基本的零支持。 ## 科研 不要期望从他那里获得任何指导，他的学术水平十分低劣，欠缺最基本的化学常识。 ## 实验室氛围 实验室的空气充满了奴隶主大种植园的风格，最重要的是极度自私自利将学生当做私人用品来随意使唤。... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Fairly hands-off. Group meetings were not very regular, but he was often available for one-on-one meetings. He integrates students and postdocs into external collaborations and follows their professional development carefully. There is very little direct assignment of projects or data, but a lot of opportunities to... Read More

夫妻档，一人一作一人通讯，抢一作，压数据，拖文章，拖久了等学生走了署名就可以自说自话任意安排啦。嫡子拿来做传统方向，外姓拿来试错，试个×年，然后好像真的行不通呢。... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship There is a weekly project meeting, often co-advised by other collaborating professors. A monthly lab meeting exists on the calendar, but it is rarely held. The PI does not proactively share lab updates. ## Expectations for PhD Students Students are expected to publish at least one or two journal papers during PhD. ##... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship High but unclear expectations. Needs constant control but also incompetent at giving guidance/support. Psychological manipulation tactics (e.g., silent treatment, withholding resources and professional opportunities) to get you to work more without directly putting it writing. No opportunity to choose your own topic.... Read More

校外导师，研究所联培，实验室条件很一般，跟学校没法比。夫妻档，一一作一通讯，压数据，卡文章，抢一作，署名顺序并非按照实际贡献。很push，要做很多跟自己课题无关的dirty... Read More

校外联培 夫妻搭档 一一作一通讯 抢一作 压数据 无指导但人格羞辱 严格打卡 不可实习，最好不好有考公等等念头会被穿小鞋... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship ## Expectations for PhD Students ## Funding & Support ## Research ## Lab... Read More