Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Hands on and nice advisor. The only problem is how much he delays the publication of the papers and is not honest with the deadlines. ## Lab Culture Everyone is nice and help each other, good lab... Read More
He's mean, rude, racist, and misogynistic. He never takes students or postdocs seriously, especially the international ones and the female ones. He's ill-tempered and very narrow-minded. He doesn't listen to students' or postdocs' opinions. His English is not very good, and he once even tried to correct a native English speaker's English - it... Read More
# PI Review ***The PI's advertised expertise and his actual capability are totally different things, and you only discover the gap after you're invested in the program. Before joining, watch one of his recorded presentations on his website — especially the Q&A portion. The pattern you'll see in how he handles technical questions is what your... Read More
He seems kind from outside and a good collaborator but be very **careful**, he has shown violence against students, including throwing things to them, yelling,... Read More
校外联培 夫妻搭档 一一作一通讯 抢一作 压数据 无指导但人格羞辱 严格打卡 不可实习，最好不好有考公等等念头会被穿小鞋... Read More
Very rude and... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 没有指导，进组就是疯狂的做项目和做项目，甚至会因为项目而让你不去上课甚至将课程推迟到下个甚至下下个学期 ## 对博士生的要求 创新点要求非常的变态，延毕延毕还是延毕，可不会因为你有一个不错的offer放你一马 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 没有科研，只有做项目和忙毕设想方设法想的创新点 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
Would I recommend this PI? Absolutely not. I feel sorry for all the people that ever worked with him. He mistakes his personal preferences for academic standards, dismisses evidence he dislikes, and uses his position to psychologically control students. Do not join this group. No paper is worth... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Difficult to work with and publish papers. ## Funding & Support Relies mostly in TAs, pays just 11 of 12 month per year. ## Lab Culture Not professional. Very nice if you do what the professor wants if not prepare for being... Read More