Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
He seems kind from outside and a good collaborator but be very **careful**, he has shown violence against students, including throwing things to them, yelling,... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship He was very hands off and just meeting 1 per month (1 hour) but kind and useful in that 1 meeting. ## Research Very respected and interesting Research . ## Lab Culture His postdocs were amazing, I mainly worked with... Read More
He's mean, rude, racist, and misogynistic. He never takes students or postdocs seriously, especially the international ones and the female ones. He's ill-tempered and very narrow-minded. He doesn't listen to students' or postdocs' opinions. His English is not very good, and he once even tried to correct a native English speaker's English - it... Read More
Extremely bad. This person has no decency or morals at all. He hates junior scientists and doesn't allow junior scientists to have a different opinion from his. If you dare to have a different opinion or point out his mistake and show proofs, he loses his temper immediately and starts to use many derogatory words on you, and if you're an... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Difficult to work with and publish papers. ## Funding & Support Relies mostly in TAs, pays just 11 of 12 month per year. ## Lab Culture Not professional. Very nice if you do what the professor wants if not prepare for being... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Abusive, passive-aggressive, absent mentor. Not open to new methods even if cheap to apply. Highly incompetent ## Expectations for PhD Students Usually takes 4-6 years to graduate, requires 2 publications, so average requirements. Overall respect of work-life balance in appearance ## Funding & Support Stipend is... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship: toxic ## Expectations for PhD Students: rude to students ## Funding & Support: lost funding ## Research: thinks obesity is healthy ## Lab Culture:... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 刚见面装得和蔼可亲,骗你进来以后就原形毕露,动不动就骂人,开会全程PUA,翻来覆去就那两句“文献看得不够”“格式不对”,这种水平谁不能当导师?最长一次一对一开三个小时组会,关键是根本没讲出任何有用的东西。还当着学生的面嘲讽别的老师,真的毫无师德,恶心至极。 ## 对博士生的要求 在他眼里学生就是廉价员工,他的利益永远是第一位,随便骂、随便压榨,表面说有问题找她,其实你身体出问题、心理出问题了?自己扛,关他屁事。典型的NPD人格,全组人都受不了。文章发不出来就甩锅给学生,阴阳怪气地嘲讽你,好像全是你的错。这种地方待下去,命都要搭进去。 ## 经费和支持... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship 亦师亦友 ## Expectations for PhD Students 对每个博士生都会有针对性的安排,不是光push科研,还会关注个人成长发展 ## Funding & Support funding充足,背靠认知全重平台,科大信息口唯一的全重 ## Research 之前做了很多推荐的东西,目前慢慢开始转向data centric ## Lab Culture... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship If you are a man, would be ok, if you are a woman expect to probably be treated unfairly (that is what I have seen but I have heard from women collegues that he has been investigated for more regarding his behaviour with women). ## Expectations for PhD Students He supports his students publish several papers (which is... Read More