Latest Reviews

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Her advisor style is based heavily on micromanaging and keeping people in the lab on their toes by being unpredictable. As an example: You have a meeting with her, plan an experiment step by step. You do everything as she says. Next lab meeting, she will end up saying she never told you to do that, and everything you... Read More

为人小气，说话聒噪[**](https://)## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More

Very negative experience regarding the course and handling of intellectual property. Students should be extremely cautious about protecting their original work. Avoid at any... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Based on my experience, supervision was largely hands-off, with no guidance. Research topics were vague, and trainees were often expected to design and work independently with no scientific input. Interactions tended to focus on publishing rather than mentorship or intellectual development. Career guidance and... Read More

## 导师的指导风格... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship ## Expectations for PhD Students ## Funding & Support ## Research ## Lab... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 与同事关系堪忧，已知其师门关系也差。为学生提供较次要的指导意见（如格式毛病、参考文献“权威性”不足等等）。热衷堆叠古籍引文，遮掩观点浅薄与逻辑混乱的地方，也要求学生帮忙搜集尽可能多的文献。 ## 对博士生的要求 会与博士生合作。但通过签约扣留博士生（以及硕士生）的硕士论文，利用保密期的时间差（甚至永久保密），加工学位论文后占为己有，屡试不爽。或利用发刊毕业要求，占据第一作者或独作坑位。不能完全否定本人的原创性，但论文产出多来自学生是板上钉钉的事实。要追认劳动贡献存在灰色地带。 ## 经费和支持 手上有国家级社科项目，借学生劳务费的幌子套取报销经费，利用微信中转，中饱私囊。... Read More

****## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More