Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
## Advisor Style & Mentorship 亦师亦友 ## Expectations for PhD Students 对每个博士生都会有针对性的安排，不是光push科研，还会关注个人成长发展 ## Funding & Support funding充足，背靠认知全重平台，科大信息口唯一的全重 ## Research 之前做了很多推荐的东西，目前慢慢开始转向data centric ## Lab Culture... Read More
He doesn't have a good reputation among multiple... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship really disorganized. asks you to do completely different thing every other week. doesnt give advice or help when you are stuck ## Expectations for PhD Students be their own advisor and take care of the grant reviews and write grants for him. ## Funding & Support honestly realtively good funding. however each quarter... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Abusive, passive-aggressive, absent mentor. Not open to new methods even if cheap to apply. Highly incompetent ## Expectations for PhD Students Usually takes 4-6 years to graduate, requires 2 publications, so average requirements. Overall respect of work-life balance in appearance ## Funding & Support Stipend is... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 纯放养，啥也不管。但手下的小导又很严，且出不了成果 ## 对博士生的要求 无要求，不卡毕业。但是第二第三篇文章得给出去。 ## 经费和支持 基本没有。 ## 科研 经常天马行空的搞些没啥用的课题。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 PUA 瞎指导 ## 经费和支持 0 ## 科研... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship: toxic ## Expectations for PhD Students: rude to students ## Funding & Support: lost funding ## Research: thinks obesity is healthy ## Lab Culture:... Read More
> 开头先放上结论，“能有办法不要接触这个老师的，尽量不要接触”——转自知乎 https://www.zhihu.com/question/41048111 -----... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 8分 ## 对博士生的要求 8分 ## 经费和支持 8分 ## 科研 9分 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship The advising style was often difficult to work with. Communication could be harsh and, at times, felt disrespectful. Feedback was not always delivered constructively, and even minor mistakes (such as small typos) could trigger disproportionately strong reactions. This made it challenging to maintain a productive and... Read More