Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
From what I've gathered, he's a good PI who invests in his mentees' growth. He has a relaxed management style, but he's open to feedback and easy to... Read More
Bad mentor. Raises his voice at his students when they make mistakes. He doesn't have a good reputation among... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship: Hands-off but offers advice when requested. Friendly and down to earth. Knowledgable but requires proactive setup of meetings to get mentorship. Lab experience can be a bit messy if not setup properly. ## Expectations for PhD Students: Normal, he expects students to perform research and motivates professional... Read More
根据某学生论坛，该老师博士生要不延毕，要不八年博士，慎选！  -----... Read More
争议很大 参考知乎：https://www.zhihu.com/question/319935010 -----... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship really disorganized. asks you to do completely different thing every other week. doesnt give advice or help when you are stuck ## Expectations for PhD Students be their own advisor and take care of the grant reviews and write grants for him. ## Funding & Support honestly realtively good funding. however each quarter... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship The advising style was often difficult to work with. Communication could be harsh and, at times, felt disrespectful. Feedback was not always delivered constructively, and even minor mistakes (such as small typos) could trigger disproportionately strong reactions. This made it challenging to maintain a productive and... Read More