Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
这位老师听说挺不错的，人看着和蔼，不会延毕学生，冲击动力学里面比较好的老师... Read More
# PI Review ***The PI's advertised expertise is totally fake, and you only discover the gap after you're invested in the program. Before joining, watch one of his recorded presentations on his website — especially the Q&A portion. You'll see him not being able to handle technical questions and dodging them. That is what your experience will be... Read More
Extremely bad. This person has no decency or morals at all. He hates junior scientists and doesn't allow junior scientists to have a different opinion from his. If you dare to have a different opinion or point out his mistake and show proofs, he loses his temper immediately and starts to use many derogatory words on you, and if you're an... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 这个导师是性格非常具有侵略性的（aggressive）。对于哲学博士（PhD）学生，他提供的是绝对零度的指导！以及极度低下的人品 & unpolite to everybody. ## 对博士生的要求 在“毕业已经是一件极端困难的事”这样的背景下，他的期望依然像天空一样高。因此，成功毕业在这里变成了一个更不可能的任务。 ## 经费和支持 关于资金（funding），我缺乏相关的知识。在事实上，这里存在着基本的零支持。 ## 科研 科学研究是纯粹的无价值垃圾。并且他的学术水平十分低劣，最基本的化学常识都欠缺。 ## 实验室氛围 实验室的空气充满了奴隶主大种植园的风格，最重要的是极度自私自利将学生当做私人用品来随意使唤。... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Hands on and nice advisor. The only problem is how much he delays the publication of the papers and is not honest with the deadlines. ## Lab Culture Everyone is nice and help each other, good lab... Read More
He seems kind from outside and a good collaborator but be very **careful**, he has shown violence against students, including throwing things to them, yelling,... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Difficult to work with and publish papers. ## Funding & Support Relies mostly in TAs, pays just 11 of 12 month per year. ## Lab Culture Not professional. Very nice if you do what the professor wants if not prepare for being... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More
Very rude and... Read More
He's mean, rude, racist, and misogynistic. He never takes students or postdocs seriously, especially the international ones and the female ones. He's ill-tempered and very narrow-minded. He doesn't listen to students' or postdocs' opinions. His English is not very good, and he once even tried to correct a native English speaker's English - it... Read More