Latest Reviews

保研人注意，这个老师言而无信，给你预留保研名额的承诺不要当真。我和另一位同学在7月份就和他联系好了，前后面试了课题组的两个老师，几天后承诺预留名额，只需参加复试即可。后面和他反复确认，他说复试不会刷人，是等额面试（后面才知道他跟6个人都这么说，实际上只有4个名额）。结果就是面试之后说我复试没通过，当时已经是9月13号了，我没有联系其他学校，好在后来填了很多学校，也收到了offer，不然真给他害惨了。一个毫无信用可言的老师... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

### 导师的指导风格非常到位 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持比较充足 ## 科研能力强 ##... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Based on my experience, supervision was largely hands-off, with no guidance. Research topics were vague, and trainees were often expected to design and work independently with no scientific input. Interactions tended to focus on publishing rather than mentorship or intellectual development. Career guidance and... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 擅长指导如何用茶杯砸副校长的头，把亲姐按在办公室门口揍，上门找自己的恩人要钱，酗酒，掼蛋，刷微信小视频。 ## 对博士生的要求 要求博士生用他满意的美术风格画图，改几个版本出来给他选。 要求博士生多做工作多写文章但不要让他改文章和投稿。 ## 经费和支持 法律允许的最小值。 ## 科研 没有一篇一作论文但评上中科大副教授兼博士生导师的高水平人才。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The supervisory style was hostile, unpredictable, and frequently inappropriate. He routinely used condescending language toward students, including statements such as telling me to “grow up” during an email exchange where I politely disagreed with him about the papers I should cite. His feedback to other students... Read More

信口开河，水平不行，来了一定会后悔。... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 与同事关系堪忧，已知其师门关系也差。为学生提供较次要的指导意见（如格式毛病、参考文献“权威性”不足等等）。热衷堆叠古籍引文，遮掩观点浅薄与逻辑混乱的地方，也要求学生帮忙搜集尽可能多的文献。 ## 对博士生的要求 会与博士生合作。但通过签约扣留博士生（以及硕士生）的硕士论文，利用保密期的时间差（甚至永久保密），加工学位论文后占为己有，屡试不爽。或利用发刊毕业要求，占据第一作者或独作坑位。不能完全否定本人的原创性，但论文产出多来自学生是板上钉钉的事实。要追认劳动贡献存在灰色地带。 ## 经费和支持 手上有国家级社科项目，借学生劳务费的幌子套取报销经费，利用微信中转，中饱私囊。... Read More

## 导师的指导风格... Read More