Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
## Advisor Style & Mentorship The advising style was often difficult to work with. Communication could be harsh and, at times, felt disrespectful. Feedback was not always delivered constructively, and even minor mistakes (such as small typos) could trigger disproportionately strong reactions. This made it challenging to maintain a productive and... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 纯放养，啥也不管。但手下的小导又很严，且出不了成果 ## 对博士生的要求 无要求，不卡毕业。但是第二第三篇文章得给出去。 ## 经费和支持 基本没有。 ## 科研 经常天马行空的搞些没啥用的课题。 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship really disorganized. asks you to do completely different thing every other week. doesnt give advice or help when you are stuck ## Expectations for PhD Students be their own advisor and take care of the grant reviews and write grants for him. ## Funding & Support honestly realtively good funding. however each quarter... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More
He doesn't have a good reputation among multiple... Read More
Bad mentor. Raises his voice at his students when they make mistakes. He doesn't have a good reputation among... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 给大方向，让学生自由发挥。平时不找学生，在遇到困难的时候给帮助。 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
As a PI, she is an excellent mentor who genuinely sees her students as whole people, not just researchers. She is deeply invested in making sure they leave her lab as capable scientists. She holds herself and her students to a high standard, both in the quality of their research and in their commitment to scientific integrity. She is very... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 感觉是那种愿意了解学生的老师，平时不管是科研上的事，还是生活里的问题，都挺关心的，比较尊重学生、也愿意站在学生角度考虑问题的那种导师。至少能保证每周的组会，如果有需求的话也可以约一对一的讨论，感觉对讨论挺鼓励的。没怎么发过邮件，回消息啥的倒是挺快的。 ## 对博士生的要求 整体来说要求是比较合理的。不是放养，但也绝对不是压榨型。导师对科研质量肯定是有追求的，能看出来是真的想把学生培养出来，而不是单纯把学生当劳动力用。我觉得人品好的导师怎么样都不会很很差。现在看来很尊重学生自己的想法，想工作的也放实习，要求和大实验室一致。组里的项目都是那种发论文的，没有需要横向干活的那种。毕业要求、年限啥的和大实验室都是一样的，传统了没啥好说的。 ## 经费和支持... Read More