Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
Very rude and... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship: toxic ## Expectations for PhD Students: rude to students ## Funding & Support: lost funding ## Research: thinks obesity is healthy ## Lab Culture:... Read More
He's a famous 'international postdoc buster' at UNR. We used to talk a lot about him at the postdoc association gatherings. If you are a prospective international postdoc, then definitely avoid him. Neither of his two international postdocs lasted longer than a few months in his group. And he tried hard to hide the fact that he had a second... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 8分 ## 对博士生的要求 8分 ## 经费和支持 8分 ## 科研 9分 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Hands on and nice advisor. The only problem is how much he delays the publication of the papers and is not honest with the deadlines. ## Lab Culture Everyone is nice and help each other, good lab... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship If you are a man, would be ok, if you are a woman expect to probably be treated unfairly (that is what I have seen but I have heard from women collegues that he has been investigated for more regarding his behaviour with women). ## Expectations for PhD Students He supports his students publish several papers (which is... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship He was very hands off and just meeting 1 per month (1 hour) but kind and useful in that 1 meeting. ## Research Very respected and interesting Research . ## Lab Culture His postdocs were amazing, I mainly worked with... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Abusive, aggressive, absent mentor. Not open to new methods even if cheap to apply. Highly incompetent ## Expectations for PhD Students Usually takes 4-6 years to graduate, requires 2 publications, so average requirements. Overall respect of work-life balance in appearance ## Funding & Support Stipend is ridiculously... Read More
He's mean, rude, racist, and misogynistic. He never takes students or postdocs seriously, especially the international ones and the female ones. He's ill-tempered and very narrow-minded. He doesn't listen to students' or postdocs' opinions. His English is not very good, and he once even tried to correct a native English speaker's English - it... Read More
Would I recommend this PI? Absolutely not. I feel sorry for all the people that ever worked with him. He mistakes his personal preferences for academic standards, dismisses evidence he dislikes, and uses his position to psychologically control students. Do not join this group. No paper is worth... Read More