Latest Reviews

转知乎 作者：柒缘 链接：https://www.zhihu.com/question/14884181475/answer/1911515652012881019 来源：知乎 著作权归作者所有。商业转载请联系作者获得授权，非商业转载请注明出处。 鉴于刘老板最近嘴又臭了，以及一些出生行为，有此回答 刘老板曾说：就算我把你们揍一顿，你们也不能拿我怎么样，因为你们的毕业证还在我手上。 刘老板曾说：你们要给我提供情绪价值（组会） 刘老板的节奏：听过就是看过，看过就是学过，学过就是精通，我们这个课题组，做什么都很快！ 刘老板谈快乐：根据快乐守恒定律，你快乐了，我就不快乐了 刘老板曾说：没有人能从我这里占到便宜 刘老板谈学生的智商：你的智商在我的课题组below average... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

## 导师的指导风格... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Her advisor style is based heavily on micromanaging and keeping people in the lab on their toes by being unpredictable. As an example: You have a meeting with her, plan an experiment step by step. You do everything as she says. Next lab meeting, she will end up saying she never told you to do that, and everything you... Read More

Back when I used to be in this lab, not a day went by where I didn’t want to kill myself. She is manipulative and emotionally abusive. On top of that she’s a sociopathic liar and will say anything to get what she wants. Don’t believe anything that comes out of her mouth … Her being nice in the beginning is all an act. Last I heard she’s still... Read More

信口开河，水平不行，来了一定会后悔。... Read More

保研人注意，这个老师言而无信，给你预留保研名额的承诺不要当真。我和另一位同学在7月份就和他联系好了，前后面试了课题组的两个老师，几天后承诺预留名额，只需参加复试即可。后面和他反复确认，他说复试不会刷人，是等额面试（后面才知道他跟6个人都这么说，实际上只有4个名额）。结果就是面试之后说我复试没通过，当时已经是9月13号了，我没有联系其他学校，好在后来填了很多学校，也收到了offer，不然真给他害惨了。一个毫无信用可言的老师... Read More

### 导师的指导风格非常到位 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持比较充足 ## 科研能力强 ##... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 与同事关系堪忧，已知其师门关系也差。为学生提供较次要的指导意见（如格式毛病、参考文献“权威性”不足等等）。热衷堆叠古籍引文，遮掩观点浅薄与逻辑混乱的地方，也要求学生帮忙搜集尽可能多的文献。 ## 对博士生的要求 会与博士生合作。但通过签约扣留博士生（以及硕士生）的硕士论文，利用保密期的时间差（甚至永久保密），加工学位论文后占为己有，屡试不爽。或利用发刊毕业要求，占据第一作者或独作坑位。不能完全否定本人的原创性，但论文产出多来自学生是板上钉钉的事实。要追认劳动贡献存在灰色地带。 ## 经费和支持 手上有国家级社科项目，借学生劳务费的幌子套取报销经费，利用微信中转，中饱私囊。... Read More