Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in all languages show default
Very rude and... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 刚见面装得和蔼可亲，骗你进来以后就原形毕露，动不动就骂人，开会全程PUA，翻来覆去就那两句“文献看得不够”“格式不对”，这种水平谁不能当导师？最长一次一对一开三个小时组会，关键是根本没讲出任何有用的东西。还当着学生的面嘲讽别的老师，真的毫无师德，恶心至极。 ## 对博士生的要求 在他眼里学生就是廉价员工，他的利益永远是第一位，随便骂、随便压榨，表面说有问题找她，其实你身体出问题、心理出问题了？自己扛，关他屁事。典型的NPD人格，全组人都受不了。文章发不出来就甩锅给学生，阴阳怪气地嘲讽你，好像全是你的错。这种地方待下去，命都要搭进去。 ## 经费和支持... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Difficult to work with and publish papers. ## Funding & Support Relies mostly in TAs, pays just 11 of 12 month per year. ## Lab Culture Not professional. Very nice if you do what the professor wants if not prepare for being... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship 亦师亦友 ## Expectations for PhD Students 对每个博士生都会有针对性的安排，不是光push科研，还会关注个人成长发展 ## Funding & Support funding充足，背靠认知全重平台，科大信息口唯一的全重 ## Research 之前做了很多推荐的东西，目前慢慢开始转向data centric ## Lab Culture... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Abusive, passive-aggressive, absent mentor. Not open to new methods even if cheap to apply. Highly incompetent ## Expectations for PhD Students Usually takes 4-6 years to graduate, requires 2 publications, so average requirements. Overall respect of work-life balance in appearance ## Funding & Support Stipend is... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 没有指导，进组就是疯狂的做项目和做项目，甚至会因为项目而让你不去上课甚至将课程推迟到下个甚至下下个学期 ## 对博士生的要求 创新点要求非常的变态，延毕延毕还是延毕，可不会因为你有一个不错的offer放你一马 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 没有科研，只有做项目和忙毕设想方设法想的创新点 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
Extremely bad. This person has no decency or morals at all. He hates junior scientists and doesn't allow junior scientists to have a different opinion from his. If you dare to have a different opinion or point out his mistake and show proofs, he loses his temper immediately and starts to use many derogatory words on you, and if you're an... Read More
Would I recommend this PI? Absolutely not. I feel sorry for all the people that ever worked with him. He mistakes his personal preferences for academic standards, dismisses evidence he dislikes, and uses his position to psychologically control students. Do not join this group. No paper is worth... Read More
# PI Review ***The PI's advertised expertise and his actual capability are totally different things, and you only discover the gap after you're invested in the program. Before joining, watch one of his recorded presentations on his website — especially the Q&A portion. The pattern you'll see in how he handles technical questions is what your... Read More