Latest Reviews

Very negative experience regarding the course and handling of intellectual property. Students should be extremely cautious about protecting their original work. Avoid at any... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

He is super push. Do not consider him if you want to live... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More

****## 导师的指导风格 ## 对博士生的要求 ## 经费和支持 ## 科研 ##... Read More

## 导师的指导风格... Read More

权力的囚徒。别靠近，会变得不幸。... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The supervisory style was hostile, unpredictable, and frequently inappropriate. He routinely used condescending language toward students, including statements such as telling me to “grow up” during an email exchange where I politely disagreed with him about the papers I should cite. His feedback to other students... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 呵 ## 对博士生的要求 呵 ## 经费和支持 呵 ## 科研 呵 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 与同事关系堪忧，已知其师门关系也差。为学生提供较次要的指导意见（如格式毛病、参考文献“权威性”不足等等）。热衷堆叠古籍引文，遮掩观点浅薄与逻辑混乱的地方，也要求学生帮忙搜集尽可能多的文献。 ## 对博士生的要求 会与博士生合作。但通过签约扣留博士生（以及硕士生）的硕士论文，利用保密期的时间差（甚至永久保密），加工学位论文后占为己有，屡试不爽。或利用发刊毕业要求，占据第一作者或独作坑位。不能完全否定本人的原创性，但论文产出多来自学生是板上钉钉的事实。要追认劳动贡献存在灰色地带。 ## 经费和支持 手上有国家级社科项目，借学生劳务费的幌子套取报销经费，利用微信中转，中饱私囊。... Read More