Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in your website language show all
Bad mentor. Raises his voice at his students when they make mistakes. He doesn't have a good reputation among... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship really disorganized. asks you to do completely different thing every other week. doesnt give advice or help when you are stuck ## Expectations for PhD Students be their own advisor and take care of the grant reviews and write grants for him. ## Funding & Support honestly realtively good funding. however each quarter... Read More
He doesn't have a good reputation among multiple... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship The advising style was often difficult to work with. Communication could be harsh and, at times, felt disrespectful. Feedback was not always delivered constructively, and even minor mistakes (such as small typos) could trigger disproportionately strong reactions. This made it challenging to maintain a productive and... Read More
From what I've gathered, he's a good PI who invests in his mentees' growth. He has a relaxed management style, but he's open to feedback and easy to... Read More
He is super push. Do not consider him if you want to live... Read More
He is very rude and condescending and makes you feel terrible and like you don't belong after every meeting. Unfortunately I love the research and I'm stuck with... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship: Hands-off but offers advice when requested. Friendly and down to earth. Knowledgable but requires proactive setup of meetings to get mentorship. Lab experience can be a bit messy if not setup properly. ## Expectations for PhD Students: Normal, he expects students to perform research and motivates professional... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 呵 ## 对博士生的要求 呵 ## 经费和支持 呵 ## 科研 呵 ## 实验室氛围... Read More