Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in your website language show all
## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More
He is very rude and condescending and makes you feel terrible and like you don't belong after every meeting. Unfortunately I love the research and I'm stuck with... Read More
Bad mentor. Raises his voice at his students when they make mistakes. He doesn't have a good reputation among... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 Trevor had been most certainly helpful with my Thesis, for the general directions and ideas he gave. He also permits a high degree of freedom, as if your idea had been good, he would encourage you doing it. He had been swift in replying emails and proactive in arranging lab meeting or personal meeting. It had been a great pleassure... Read More
She enjoys belittling students. She denies their contributions. She also loves arguing with students about things unrelated to academics. She's not as kind to students as she claims. She believes students should frequently stay up late. Working with her is incredibly... Read More
## 导师的指导风格 呵 ## 对博士生的要求 呵 ## 经费和支持 呵 ## 科研 呵 ## 实验室氛围... Read More
## Advisor Style & Mentorship Her advisor style is based heavily on micromanaging and keeping people in the lab on their toes by being unpredictable. As an example: You have a meeting with her, plan an experiment step by step. You do everything as she says. Next lab meeting, she will end up saying she never told you to do that, and everything you... Read More
He doesn't have a good reputation among multiple... Read More