Latest Reviews

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The supervisory style was hostile, unpredictable, and frequently inappropriate. He routinely used condescending language toward students, including statements such as telling me to “grow up” during an email exchange where I politely disagreed with him about the papers I should cite. His feedback to other students... Read More

Hi is really supportive and approachable, set clear expectations, and give you room to grow. The lab culture is genuinely fun and collaborative, and if you ever need help, they’re always there to guide you. It’s a great environment to learn and do research. I did see another comment that was more negative, so I think it might be a good idea to set... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Based on my experience, supervision was largely hands-off, with no guidance. Research topics were vague, and trainees were often expected to design and work independently with no scientific input. Interactions tended to focus on publishing rather than mentorship or intellectual development. Career guidance and... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Her advisor style is based heavily on micromanaging and keeping people in the lab on their toes by being unpredictable. As an example: You have a meeting with her, plan an experiment step by step. You do everything as she says. Next lab meeting, she will end up saying she never told you to do that, and everything you... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship ## Expectations for PhD Students ## Funding & Support ## Research ## Lab Culture 总的来说，要他指导任何东西就算了。 上课纯ppt。划重点则是把全文都画上。张口闭口就是他在 1980 年的什么经历，质量可见一斑。 至于科研，非常神奇的一个人。任何东西他都会指导，但其实他也只是在build 自己的 resume罢了。基本没有任何帮助。 甚至有过盗发学生文章，侵占科研经费的情况。文章被盗发的学生向学校ac部门举报，而学校的ac部门自然是玩消失啦~... Read More

Very negative experience regarding the course and handling of intellectual property. Students should be extremely cautious about protecting their original work. Avoid at any... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

## 导师的指导风格 啊 ## 对博士生的要求 嘎 ## 经费和支持 咦 ## 科研 呵 ## 实验室氛围... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship ## Expectations for PhD Students ## Funding & Support ## Research ## Lab... Read More

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership was very weak and characterized by unrealistic expectations. (both scientifically and in terms of time). Proper guidance was minimal, and communication was often unclear or contradictory. When asked concrete questions, responses were typically lengthy, vague, and diffuse, often failing to address the actual... Read More