Check out iCourses.com - Course Rating Website

Latest Reviews

Randomly selected 10 recent reviews in your website language show all

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Dr. Kelson's Advisor Style is a Communicator. In order to do well as his Graduate Student in his research lab, ALWAYS communicate with him. Best methods of communication is DIRECTLY in person with him at his office. Second best mode of communication is calling & texting him through his phone number of which he will... Read More

Posted: Review #669

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Leadership is poor and irrationally driven by her intrinsic need to produce results supporting particular pre-made conclusions. Her mentorship is pressurizing students and to blame them publically for her supervision mistakes. She makes up false facts to threaten students and to make them insecure. ## Expectations for... Read More

Posted: Review #688

## Advisor Style & Mentorship ## Expectations for PhD Students ## Funding & Support ## Research ## Lab... Read More

Posted: Review #677

## Advisor Style & Mentorship In my experience, the advisory style and mentorship were very poor. Meetings were frequent, but mostly not helpful. Discussions focused mainly on short-term results and not on a clear project goal or plan. Feedback was often very harsh and confusing. Contradictory statements were common. For example, we agreed to use... Read More

Posted: Review #687

Down-to-earth, intelligent, and approachable. Highly... Read More

Posted: Review #660

Students in the group have scary stories. I do not... Read More

Posted: Review #659

## Advisor Style & Mentorship The supervisory style was hostile, unpredictable, and frequently inappropriate. He routinely used condescending language toward students, including statements such as telling me to “grow up” during an email exchange where I politely disagreed with him about the papers I should cite. His feedback to other students... Read More

Posted: Review #683

## Advisor Style & Mentorship Based on my experience, supervision was largely hands-off, with no guidance. Research topics were vague, and trainees were often expected to design and work independently with no scientific input. Interactions tended to focus on publishing rather than mentorship or intellectual development. Career guidance and... Read More

Posted: Review #692

The problem with this website is that if an advisor sees this, it isn't too hard to figure out who wrote it from the advisor's perspective. I want to write many more details, but it could easily expose all his students to harm. I will speak generally about Ghassan: * He doesn't know much about Machine Learning, but micro manages students as if he... Read More

Posted: Review #649